🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an adorable small “ham sandwich”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a big but guardian-like friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and moves like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “most affectionate” with a heart of gold.

A group of thirty captive marine mammals in a Canada-based entertainment facility have been entangled in a tussle between a shuttered park, local and national governments and welfare campaigners.

But those most familiar with the whales say the impassioned debate over their destiny often ignores the nuances of the whales who, after living their entire lives in confinement, have been carefully observed by the humans who work with them regularly.

After the national authorities disallowed the sale of the belugas to a foreign facility, the controversial attraction near Niagara Falls where they are kept threatened to end their lives unless the federal government pays for the upkeep of their care. The nation’s marine resources official has denied that demand, placing the 30 whales in an increasingly precarious position.

Intelligent Sea Creatures

Experts say that belugas’ neural makeup, along with their sound replication, intellectual tasks and communal behavior suggest they are remarkably smart creatures – something Kristy Burgess observed directly.

She spent three years as a marine mammal specialist, a role that involved building relationships of the marine predators.

“Building up those connections over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of love. At the start, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so extraordinary and rewarding.”

The trainer knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was nevertheless amazed by the nuances and idiosyncrasies in their personalities. She developed a special affection for a pair of whales with contrasting temperaments.

“Eve chose me. The other made me earn it,” she said. “Both altered the way I perceive bonding.”

Growing Opposition and Facility Decline

Burgess’s connection with the whales progressed against a context of growing public opposition to their confinement.

During her tenure at the attraction, multiple belugas and the park’s one killer whale, Kiska, succumbed. In all, 19 belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a statistic which the facility links to age-related causes, but which activists say points to the poor conditions in which they were housed.

The facility did not admit visitors to the public over the summer, but Burgess says she saw with her own eyes effects of the cessation. “Concrete is falling apart from the pools because they’re degrading and not being maintained. The whales are exploratory and so they pick it up and move about with pieces in their jaws. It’s distressing to see.”

The park did not comment to a questionnaire, but in the past claimed: “The whales … obtain far better veterinary services and 24/7 care than any individual in the UK, or elsewhere.”

Uncertain Future and Proposed Solutions

The former employee was dismissed from the park in early March following the demise of a beluga, an unwell beluga the park staff had to humanely kill. She said the park suspected details of the incident were leaked to the media and she was released soon after.

The uncertainty over the whales’ outcome has left her and staff members in anguish. She says the park’s warning to kill its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “logistically impossible” task, adding any efforts to humanely kill even a single beluga would require “significant manpower”, vehicles and machinery.

“There’s no way in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

She advocates for requests for the whales to be removed immediately from the park, with its deteriorating pools and dwindling staff.

In recent months, the nation’s fisheries minister turned down a bid to export the whales to an overseas location.

“Allowing the proposal would have meant a perpetual situation in confinement and a return to performance for audiences,” the official commented. “As society, we know that belugas belong in the sea, not in tanks for our entertainment. I could not in clear conscience authorize an export that would perpetuate the conditions these belugas have suffered.”

But the former trainer said the official’s statements reflect a wider misunderstanding of the facts of living conditions for belugas born in captivity.

“The society needs to understand these are whales that have existed solely in confinement and they will need constant supervision for the foreseeable future,” she said. “People just don’t realize that it’s not as simple as saying ‘close it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate

As authorities work to find a resolution, suggestions have been put forward, some of which have little basis in reality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be freed into the wilds of Canada’s north – where whales are a primary resource of sustenance for Inuit communities.

A proposed refuge in the region of eastern Canada, which has received regulatory clearance, has been highly debated. The prospective site, which includes a large area of enclosed sea water, remains undeveloped. Supporters remain positive that it could ultimately represent a permanent answer for a number of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among trainers she’s spoken with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “only an untested concept” in the whales’ fate.

Some experts say the idea of a refuge reflects a broader global shift away from captive facilities and could represent a viable solution in the short term.

Charles Vinick, head of the sanctuary project, said the location will simulate the mental engagement and nutrition the whales get from specialists, albeit in a significantly bigger environment. He said after the well-being of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|